← Invoc

What NOVA is

And why, in 2026, a filled sponge biscuit does not grow on a tree.

NOVA sorts foods into four groups by how much they have been processed, and to what end. It was devised by researchers in public health nutrition at the University of São Paulo, around Carlos Monteiro, and Open Food Facts uses it. It answers a different question from the Nutri-Score: not “how much sugar, salt or fibre?” but “how far is this from the plant or the animal it came from?”. Here is what the four groups are, why most of what you buy wrapped sits in group 3 or 4, and what Invoc does with it.

The four groups, in their authors’ words

In its authors’ own words (Monteiro and colleagues, 2019):

“NOVA classifies all foods and food products into four groups according to the extent and purpose of the industrial processing they undergo.”

Public Health Nutrition, “Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them” (open access). Read the article

The four groups, as published by Open Food Facts, which calls NOVA “a classification in 4 groups to highlight the degree of processing of foods”.

  1. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods

    “Unprocessed (or natural) foods are edible parts of plants (seeds, fruits, leaves, stems, roots) or of animals (muscle, offal, eggs, milk), and also fungi, algae and water, after separation from nature.”

    An apple, an egg, dried lentils, plain yoghurt, frozen peas.

  2. Processed culinary ingredients

    “Processed culinary ingredients, such as oils, butter, sugar and salt, are substances derived from Group 1 foods or from nature by processes that include pressing, refining, grinding, milling and drying.”

    What you cook with, not what you eat on its own.

  3. Processed foods

    “Processed foods, such as bottled vegetables, canned fish, fruits in syrup, cheeses and freshly made breads, are made essentially by adding salt, oil, sugar or other substances from Group 2 to Group 1 foods.”

    A tin of sardines in oil, a jar of pickles, a loaf from the baker.

  4. Ultra-processed foods

    “Ultra-processed foods, such as soft drinks, sweet or savoury packaged snacks, reconstituted meat products and pre-prepared frozen dishes, are not modified foods but formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from foods and additives, with little if any intact Group 1 food.”

    A soft drink, a packet of crisps, a filled sponge biscuit, a frozen ready meal.

Open Food Facts, “Nova groups for food processing” (the four definitions as published there). Read the page

Why, in 2026, a filled sponge biscuit does not grow on a tree

Take a filled sponge biscuit. Nobody picks it. Wheat is milled into flour, beet or cane is refined into sugar, a fat is pressed and refined; the three are mixed, baked, filled and wrapped, and the packet then waits on a shelf for weeks, and in your cupboard for a while more. By the definition above, that is group 4: a formulation made mostly from substances derived from foods, with additives, and little intact group 1 food.

The group does not say whether the biscuit is good or bad. It says what kind of thing it is: made, not grown. The same goes for a soft drink, a breakfast cereal, a ready meal or a sliced sandwich loaf. A food that keeps, travels and is ready to eat has been processed to do exactly that; it is the point of processing. In a supermarket, most shelves are groups 3 and 4, so the useful question is rarely “is it processed?”. It is “which one, among the products of the same kind?”.

Additives: why they are there

A processed food has to stay safe, and look and taste in week three as it did on day one. That is what additives are for. In the words of the European Food Safety Authority:

“Food additives are substances added to food and drinks for various reasons, such as to maintain or improve their safety, freshness, taste, texture or appearance.”

And on the E numbers you read in an ingredient list:

“In the European Union (EU) all food additives are identified by an E number, and their safety is evaluated before they can be permitted for use in food.”

So an E number on a label is the sign of a substance that was evaluated and named, not a warning. Thanks to additives, among other means (heat, cold and packaging do a large part of the keeping), food can be made somewhere else, travel, sit in a shop and wait a few days for you. The other way round, each of us would need a piece of garden and the time to tend it, which few of us have. The useful question is not “does it contain additives?” but “how many, next to the other products of the same kind?”.

European Food Safety Authority, “Food additives”. Read the page

What the public health advice says, and what NOVA does not say

Santé publique France, in its dietary advice (in French), on ultra-processed products:

« Parce qu’on ne connaît pas encore précisément leur impact sur la santé humaine, il est conseillé de réduire leur consommation. »

That is, because their effect on human health is not yet precisely known, it is advised to reduce their consumption. That is the advice; this page adds nothing to it.

Santé publique France, Manger Bouger, « Réduire les boissons sucrées, aliments gras, sucrés, salés et ultra-transformés ». Read the page (in French)

Two limits to keep in mind. NOVA reads how far a food was processed, and nothing else: two products of group 4 can differ widely in sugar, salt and fibre, and that is what the Nutri-Score letter is for. And a NOVA group worked out from a label is only as good as the ingredient list behind it. Open Food Facts says so of its own computation:

“Please note that this is still experimental work as multilingual taxonomisation of ingredients is still an ongoing work on Open Food Facts.”

A product whose record has no ingredient list has no reliable group yet.

Open Food Facts, “Nova groups for food processing”. Read the page

In the Invoc app

Next to the Nutri-Score letter, the app shows the product’s NOVA group, from 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed) to 4 (ultra-processed), as recorded in Open Food Facts, and the number of additives found in the ingredient list of its record (E numbers and named additives), grouped as 0, 1, 2 or 3 and more.

Products are compared with products of the same category. The first step compares those that also share the Nutri-Score letter, the NOVA group and the additive bucket; if fewer than 5 products share all four, the additive criterion is dropped, then the NOVA criterion, then only the letter is kept. NOVA group and additives are not part of Invoc’s index: they act as group walls.

So a filled sponge biscuit is placed next to other filled biscuits of the same group, not next to an apple. That is the one comparison that helps in the aisle.

How Invoc compares products: the methodReading the Nutri-Score: the guide

See it on a product

Scan a barcode with Invoc: the product appears among comparable products, with its Nutri-Score letter, its NOVA group and its number of additives.

Further reading

Page published on 13 October 2026. NOVA is the work of its authors at the University of São Paulo; Nutri-Score is a trademark of Santé publique France. Invoc is not affiliated with any of the publishers named on this page; the linked pages belong to them. This page gives information about food labelling. It is not medical or dietary advice.